Offbeat

Legal

Google hit with lawsuit for dropping free Workspace apps

Free Forever, or Free Until We Decide It Isn't policy criticised in filing


A putative class action lawsuit has been filed against Google in California by early adopters who are unhappy about the ads company's decision to demand fees for its Workspace productivity suite.

At the $5 million suit's core is an allegation that Google promised early adopters of what would later become Google Workspace that they would get to use a free version of the service for as long as the search giant offered it.

Google Apps first arrived in 2006, was rebranded G Suite in 2016 and, in 2020, the rebrando-wand was waved once again to give customers the Google Workspace of today.

The complaint [PDF], filed on August 5 in a San Jose district court, alleges: "From 2006 until 2012, in order to convince potential users to leave well-developed suites of services offered by Google's competitors (eg, Microsoft Office), Google made a promise to early adopters of Google Workspace. Google promised that such users would always be provided a free version of Workspace (including at least the features that the service had when these customers signed up) as long as Google offered the Workspace service."

As far as Workspace is concerned, after being referred to as a legacy service, the freebie G-Suite apps were discontinued in favor of Workspace this year, although one could continue to use the tools for personal use.

Key to the complaint is an allegation that the workplace apps that first emerged in 2006 were refined with the assistance of feedback from those early adopters, resulting in something that was professional enough to actually charge for by 2012.

As well as castigating Google for dropping its "don't be evil" slogan ("Google's abandonment of the credo "don't be evil" is well-illustrated in this case," the lawyers claimed), the complaint reproduced statements from the search giant at the time, including:

"...organizations that sign up during the beta period will not ever have to pay for users accepted during that period (provided Google continues to offer the service)."

The Register asked Google for its reaction to the complaint, and we will update this piece should a response be forthcoming. ®

Send us news
42 Comments

Why France this week fined Google €250M over web news

Google pulls a few coins from the sofa and says whatever, just clarify who needs to be paid for what

Google's AI-powered search results are loaded with spammy, scammy garbage

Be careful where you click

First the Super Bowl, now this: Kansas City getting a Google bit barn

Exact location, power source, and go-live date unknown. But don't worry, there'll be digital jobs

India's competition regulator orders Google Play payment probe

Choice of alternative payment providers labelled 'illusory' – because none existed

Sorry, Siri: Apple may be eyeing Google Gemini for future iPhones

Famous for keeping everything in-house, Apple may be carving AI-shaped door in its garden wall

Google gooses Safe Browsing with real-time protection that doesn't leak to ad giant

Rare occasion when you do want Big Tech to make a hash of it

The way Apple, Alphabet implemented DMA rules 'seems to be at odds' with law

European Commission says 12-month investigation could lead to fine of up to 10% of global revenue

Microsoft says AI alliances are needed to compete with Google

Only the Chocolate Factory is 'vertically integrated' to win at 'every AI layer from chips to a thriving mobile app store'

EU antitrust cops probe Microsoft ties between Entra ID and 365 services

Google claims rival has made an 'art and science' out of licensing

Leaked docs hint Google may use SiFive RISC-V cores in next-gen TPUs

Would put those AI accelerators out of Arm's reach, at least

Poking holes in Google tech bagged bug hunters $10M

A $2M drop from previous year. So … things are more secure?

Google brains plumb depths of the uncanny valley with latest image-to-video tool

VLOGGER needs just a still photo and an audio recording to generate footage, but it's far from perfect