Nutanix photo-bombs VMware's selfie with delayed patent release

Patent signed off in December revealed day before VMware debuts VSAN


On 3 December, 2013, the US Patent And Trademark Office signed off patent 8,601,473, titled “Architecture for managing I/O and storage for a virtualization environment”.

On Wednesday 5 March, 2014, the holder of that patent, Nutanix, popped out a press release and other material explaining it.

The day of Nutanix's announcement was just one day beforeVMware launched its own VSAN, a product that competes more or less head to head with Nutanix.

You don't have to be as suspicious as a Reg hack to imagine that the timing of the announcement about the patent was not coincidental, and that Nutanix was indulging in the intellectual property equivalent of a photo-bomb.

Nutanix CEO Dheeraj Pandey is having none of that, although when we asked him what this was all about he spoke quite slowly and deliberately. The patent was announced on 5 March, he told The Reg, because it took a while to work it into Nutanix's marketing collateral. That job just happened to be done in time for Nutanix to tell the world about its patent the day before the VSAN launch.

Pandey also sees upside in the advent of VSAN as “validation for our approach”.

“The mere fact that it was granted means it has been examined by the USPTO for prior art and was more than worthy to attain patent status,” Pandey said. “I think it is beneficial for the industry to review the patent and our blueprint.”

Pandey added: “Nutanix is very proud of the patent. This vision and this architecture has driven us to a leadership position we will retain regardless of market developments.” ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Everything you wanted to know about modern network congestion control but were perhaps too afraid to ask

    In which a little unfairness can be quite beneficial

    Systems Approach It’s hard not to be amazed by the amount of active research on congestion control over the past 30-plus years. From theory to practice, and with more than its fair share of flame wars, the question of how to manage congestion in the network is a technical challenge that resists an optimal solution while offering countless options for incremental improvement.

    This seems like a good time to take stock of where we are, and ask ourselves what might happen next.

    Congestion control is fundamentally an issue of resource allocation — trying to meet the competing demands that applications have for resources (in a network, these are primarily link bandwidth and router buffers), which ultimately reduces to deciding when to say no and to whom. The best framing of the problem I know traces back to a paper [PDF] by Frank Kelly in 1997, when he characterized congestion control as “a distributed algorithm to share network resources among competing sources, where the goal is to choose source rate so as to maximize aggregate source utility subject to capacity constraints.”

    Continue reading
  • How business makes streaming faster and cheaper with CDN and HESP support

    Ensure a high video streaming transmission rate

    Paid Post Here is everything about how the HESP integration helps CDN and the streaming platform by G-Core Labs ensure a high video streaming transmission rate for e-sports and gaming, efficient scalability for e-learning and telemedicine and high quality and minimum latencies for online streams, media and TV broadcasters.

    HESP (High Efficiency Stream Protocol) is a brand new adaptive video streaming protocol. It allows delivery of content with latencies of up to 2 seconds without compromising video quality and broadcasting stability. Unlike comparable solutions, this protocol requires less bandwidth for streaming, which allows businesses to save a lot of money on delivery of content to a large audience.

    Since HESP is based on HTTP, it is suitable for video transmission over CDNs. G-Core Labs was among the world’s first companies to have embedded this protocol in its CDN. With 120 points of presence across 5 continents and over 6,000 peer-to-peer partners, this allows a service provider to deliver videos to millions of viewers, to any devices, anywhere in the world without compromising even 8K video quality. And all this comes at a minimum streaming cost.

    Continue reading
  • Cisco deprecates Microsoft management integrations for UCS servers

    Working on Azure integration – but not there yet

    Cisco has deprecated support for some third-party management integrations for its UCS servers, and emerged unable to play nice with Microsoft's most recent offerings.

    Late last week the server contender slipped out an end-of-life notice [PDF] for integrations with Microsoft System Center's Configuration Manager, Operations Manager, and Virtual Machine Manager. Support for plugins to VMware vCenter Orchestrator and vRealize Orchestrator have also been taken out behind an empty rack with a shotgun.

    The Register inquired about the deprecations, and has good news and bad news.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021