Liberal MP threatens journo with metadata probe

Assistant infrastructure minister Jamie Briggs Tweets up a storm

Mere weeks after Australia's government passed its metadata retention laws, a junior minister has - perhaps jokingly - threatened to use them against a journalist.

The minister in question is Jamie Briggs, member for the South Australian seat of Mayo and assistant minister for infrastructure and regional development.

Briggs first tweeted his displeasure with Fairfax Media scribe Peter Martin. Crikey writer Bernard Keene responded to that Tweet, at which point Briggs responded with the following*.

Briggs has provided no context for the Tweet.

Senior government figures have been at pains to reassure the public that metadata retention will not lead to surveillance of ordinary citizens unless they are suspected of involvement in serious crimes. Australia's recently-passed metadata retention laws also included provisions to protect journalists' sources, to ensure the new law does not stop whistleblowers. Another of the law's provisions makes it an offence to reveal the existence of a warrant seeking journalists' metadata.

Mentioning easy access to media metadata for members of parliament therefore represents a significant counter-narrative.

+Comment Briggs looks to have indulged himself in what he will perceive as a joke, during banter with journalists widely considered to be opponents of the current government. But the joke will, and deserves to, fall flat. Australians have been told metadata retention is necessary to stop terrorism and sex crimes against children, and that journalists are worthy of limited exceptions.

The mere suggestion that government could use metadata as a way to smear its opponents runs counter to those assurances.

Briggs' Tweets will doubtless be seized upon by opponents of metadata retention, who can argue he has revealed the government's true intentions. Briggs deserves whatever mess follows: he should know better than to trivialise this topic. ®

* Captured here as a screen shot in case Briggs deletes them.

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Samsung fined $14 million for misleading smartphone water resistance claims
    Promoted phones as ready for a dunking – forgot to mention known problems with subsequent recharges

    Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission has fined Samsung Electronics AU$14 million ($9.6 million) for making for misleading water resistance claims about 3.1 million smartphones.

    The Commission (ACCC) says that between 2016 and 2018 Samsung advertised its Galaxy S7, S7 Edge, A5, A7, S8, S8 Plus and Note 8 smartphones as capable of surviving short submersions in the sea or fresh water.

    As it happens The Register attended the Australian launch of the Note 8 and watched on in wonder as it survived a brief dunking and bubbles appeared to emerge from within the device. Your correspondent recalls Samsung claiming that the waterproofing reflected the aim of designing a phone that could handle Australia's outdoors lifestyle.

    Continue reading
  • Five Eyes alliance’s top cop says techies are the future of law enforcement
    Crims have weaponized tech and certain States let them launder the proceeds

    Australian Federal Police (AFP) commissioner Reece Kershaw has accused un-named nations of helping organized criminals to use technology to commit and launder the proceeds of crime, and called for international collaboration to developer technologies that counter the threats that behaviour creates.

    Kershaw’s remarks were made at a meeting of the Five Eyes Law Enforcement Group (FELEG), the forum in which members of the Five Eyes intelligence sharing pact – Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the UK and the USA – discuss policing and related matters. Kershaw is the current chair of FELEG.

    “Criminals have weaponized technology and have become ruthlessly efficient at finding victims,” Kerhsaw told the group, before adding : “State actors and citizens from some nations are using our countries at the expense of our sovereignty and economies.”

    Continue reading
  • Police lab wants your happy childhood pictures to train AI to detect child abuse
    Like the Hotdog, Not Hotdog app but more Kidnapped, Not Kidnapped

    Updated Australia's federal police and Monash University are asking netizens to send in snaps of their younger selves to train a machine-learning algorithm to spot child abuse in photographs.

    Researchers are looking to collect images of people aged 17 and under in safe scenarios; they don't want any nudity, even if it's a relatively innocuous picture like a child taking a bath. The crowdsourcing campaign, dubbed My Pictures Matter, is open to those aged 18 and above, who can consent to having their photographs be used for research purposes.

    All the images will be amassed into a dataset managed by Monash academics in an attempt to train an AI model to tell the difference between a minor in a normal environment and an exploitative, unsafe situation. The software could, in theory, help law enforcement better automatically and rapidly pinpoint child sex abuse material (aka CSAM) in among thousands upon thousands of photographs under investigation, avoiding having human analysts inspect every single snap.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022