It only took Oz govt transformation bods 6 months and $700k to report that blockchain ain't worth the effort

Snarking at vendors: Priceless

An Australian government agency given AU$700,000 (just shy of US$500,000 or £380,000) to research applications of the blockchain has delivered its answer: don't bother. Anything you want to do with blockchain, you can already do better with existing technology.

For every use of blockchain that you would consider today, there is a better technology...

The Digital Transformation Agency (DTA), Australia's answer to Blighty's Government Digital Service, received the research windfall in the federal government's May budget, with a brief from ex-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull to help, er, Dunning-Kruger Australia's government.

A squadron of thought-bubbles took flight. In May, DTA chief digital officer Peter Alexander told the Australian senate committee blockchain was under investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (for corporate regulation); the Department of Home Affairs (tracking immigration records); and being looked at for Centrelink welfare payments. There were also mooted applications in cargo management, trade settlement, or to guarantee the provenance of open data.

Then came a push from vendors that makes living in a cave sound attractive. "I personally had 15 companies come to see me and talk to me about blockchain, the opportunities of blockchain and how it could solve every problem that we might have," he said (except, El Reg supposes, the problem of making the vendor presentations stop).

After toiling in the mine for six months trying to extract ore from endless "blockchain can do this" claims, Alexander yesterday morning reported back to the senate committee: it's not worth the effort.

"Our position today, and this is an early write-up, is that blockchain is an interesting technology that would be well worth being observed, but without standardisation and a lot more work, for every use of blockchain that you would consider today, there is a better technology," he said.

He added that "without standardisation, there is the challenge of blockchain becoming a little fragmented", and genuine opportunities to use the technology will have to wait until useful standards are in place.

Alexander pointed out that one of blockchain's big selling points, anonymity, isn't particularly useful in government-to-citizen dealings, which are more likely to need a trust relationship between known parties.

He also reiterated the relentless nature of the vendor push. "A lot of the big vendors are pushing blockchain very hard, and internationally most of the hype around blockchain is coming from vendors and companies, not from governments and users and deliverers of services."

The project that was to have been blockchain's proof-of-concept, for the Centrelink welfare payments system, is due to be in prototype next year. When first mooted, it got glowing reports like this one in The Conversation, but given Alexander's comments today, "dead parrot" may not be too harsh a description.

With its blockchain work completed, the DTA staff can now return to their more accustomed role of trying to oversee failing government IT projects. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022