Researchers find 134 flaws in the way Word, PDFs, handle scripts

‘Cooperative mutation’ spots problems that checking code alone will miss

Black Hat Asia Security researchers have devised a tool that detects flaws in the way apps like Microsoft Word and Adobe Acrobat process JavaScript, and it's proven so effective they've found 134 bugs – 59 of them considered worthy of a fix by vendors, 33 assigned a CVE number, and 17 producing bug bounty payments totaling $22,000.

The tool is named "Cooper" – a reference to the "Cooperative mutation" technique employed by the tool.

Speaking at the Black Hat Asia conference in Singapore, PhD student Xu Peng of the Chinese Academy of Sciences – one of the tool's co-authors – explained that the likes of Word and Acrobat accept input from scripting languages. Acrobat, for example, allows JavaScript to manipulate PDF files.

Making that happen requires the PDF both to define native PDF objects and to parse JavaScript code. The native objects are processed by Acrobat modules, and an embedded JavaScript engine handles the scripts. A "binding layer" does the translation.

In his talk and a paper [PDF] describing Cooper, Xu and his collaborators assert the binding code "is prone to inconsistent semantics and security holes, which lead to severe vulnerabilities."

That bit about severe vulns is not just bluster. Cooper identified CVE-2021-21028 and – a pair of 8.8/10 rated flaws in Acrobat.

Xu said Cooper can find such flaws because the cooperative mutation technique it uses "simultaneously modifies the script code and the related document objects to explore various code paths of the binding code." That approach contrasts with other defensive techniques that check for flaws in scripts.

As explained on the tool's GitHub page, Cooper has three components:

  • Object Clustering In the beginning, Cooper parses the given sample documents to extract native objects. To reduce the object search space, Cooper categorizes objects into different classes based on their attributes.
  • Relationship Inference Then, Cooper produces a large number of documents by combining different object classes and API groups, and records the execution results of the embedded scripts. Based on the success rate of the script execution and the distribution of object classes, Cooper infers the relationships between API groups and object classes.
  • Relationship-Guided Mutation Finally, Cooper leverages the inferred relationship to guide the object selection, script generation and object mutation.

Cooper is therefore in some ways an elaborate fuzzing tool – inferring the relationships guides the process of searching for conditions under which scripts, apps, and the binding layer produce unwanted and/or dangerous behaviour.

The tool is itself a set of scripts – in Python – and is yours for the asking here.

The project was created by Xu Peng and Professor Purui Su, both of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, security researcher Yanhao Wang from the QI-ANXIN Technology Research Institute, and Hong Hu, an assistant professor at Pennsylvania State University. ®

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022