AuthenTec sells out to Apple to the sound of 1,000 lawsuits

Directors hounded for not hawking the business to Samsung


The $356m purchase of AuthenTec by Apple has not been universally welcomed. Not only are analysts and potential rivals trying to piece together the logic of the deal, but investors and, more importantly, class actions lawyers, are trying to work out if the 60 per cent trading premium that the deal is set at, was sufficiently high.

There is a thought out there that since AuthenTec had just concluded a deal with Samsung, its directors had the fiduciary duty when approached by Apple to at least ask Samsung if it wanted to counter-bid. We cannot go along with that thinking. When a board is approached with an outstanding offer compared with its current share value, it has every right to take the money and commit the company to a merger. However what these complaints might make possible is the extension of the time period over which the deal will move to completion, and that MAY give AuthenTec time to at least talk to Samsung.

Of course the whole point of agreeing cancellation fees (there are two way cancellation fees in here valued at $20m from Apple and $10.95m the other way) is so that the target company cannot go and talk to someone else and ramp the price, and so that the buyer cannot walk away, having shown an acceptable bid valuation to the world.

Since AuthenTec is a company that only has $18m in the bank, it had better have a very good reason to change its mind and fail to sell to Apple, and lose that cash. And anyway it has a customary "no-shop" restriction placed on its ability to solicit alternative proposals from third parties or to enter any kind of discussion. This has to be subject to some exceptions, such as when another company approaches it, it must have something to say.

But we expect that whatever comes of these legal moves, the deal is more or less done and Apple will get the spoils, even if anyone gets shareholders a little more cash. So why does it want AuthenTec? Most analysts in this area cannot see the wood for the trees. The first thing they do is look up what this company does. The bulk of its revenues comes from fingerprint recognition systems and it has genuine IPR here. It is a decent market leader in this nascent field, and most people assume that Apple will use this technology for one of two things, to secure iOS devices on a fingerprint, for either enterprise apps or to introduce it for mobile payments.

The myth of fingerprints

We tend to think this is pie in the sky. You cannot dominate the global banking community and introduce authentication technology which they have yet to approve of, no matter how ground breaking. Apple already has patents on accessing devices using unique gestures and these have already all been copied by rivals.

On the enterprise front there may be applications where this could be used, but to put this in perspective, right now AuthenTec has only quarterly revenues just over $10m in fingerprint recognition. These revenues are going down, or are at best flat, and the company has recently reduced its R&D in this area marginally. So what else could Apple be after?

Well there are two other security businesses that AuthenTec is present in, using software protection for DRM systems, so that you can have an (arguably) secure downloadable DRM, and a silicon based embedded execution area for encryption – a set of cores that can be used to securely process decryption on-chip, which any security software layer could benefit from. Samsung has recently taken this to underpin a VPN, but it might just as easily be used to underpin a DRM system for video delivery.

HD video on tablet

Now one of the debates that has been raging around the most recently launched iPad is the ability of its screen to handle HD video content. Hollywood has vacillated between banning premium HD video from portable devices and allowing it. The best solution has seemed to be to downgrade the resolution on this video for tablets. Many content owners allow video which is premium paid video, such as pay TV, to be delivered over IP in parallel with its TV delivery, to tablets, but at a lower resolution, while some ban it altogether.

But blocking HD content to a tablet is a lottery – your rival may get many more viewers by NOT banning it, because tablets of all types are taking off. The problem has been the software only nature of the security and only two solutions have emerged which really offer any comfort at all, one from Arxan, which AuthenTec uses, and one from Irdeto called Active Cloak for Media, and both use a form of white box encryption, as well as object code obfuscation and multiple frequent authentications between system components.

These two systems are dominant but slightly different, and regardless what both companies say about how secure they are, they are not secure enough to entrust Premium paid HD content to, where it has not yet been widely pirated. One security analyst told us that if smart cards were a 9 out of 10 in security terms, these software only systems were a two and a half.

The most secure approach is putting a secure set of decryption processing cores – complete with a hardware enforced firewall and separate processing elements for decrypting keys, on the processing chip. The problem here is that although AuthenTec offers its DRM Fusion product as a secure software only, downloadable DRM, the underlying security technology belongs to Arxan, and so it has no real IPR to offer Apple, which is what leads us to believe that this is not the reason for Apple‘s interest.

AuthenTec has made a number of strides here and signed some new customers recently, but while many of the App Store video apps are based on either the Arxan or AuthenTec implementations, Apple should have been buying Arxan if it wanted to control this process. This brings us to AuthenTec‘s third security business, based on its SafeXcel IP chip cores. AuthenTec acquired this technology from SafeNet two years ago along with its DRM Fusion product and since it did so it has been investing more R&D in this than any other part of its product portfolio, doubling it each year so far.

Next page: Luring in the devs

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Workers win vote to form first-ever US Apple Store union
    Results set to be ratified by labor board by end of the week

    Workers at an Apple Store in Towson, Maryland have voted to form a union, making them the first of the iGiant's retail staff to do so in the United States.

    Out of 110 eligible voters, 65 employees voted in support of unionization versus 33 who voted against it. The organizing committee, known as the Coalition of Organized Retail Employees (CORE), has now filed to certify the results with America's National Labor Relations Board. Members joining this first-ever US Apple Store union will be represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM).

    "I applaud the courage displayed by CORE members at the Apple store in Towson for achieving this historic victory," IAM's international president Robert Martinez Jr said in a statement on Saturday. "They made a huge sacrifice for thousands of Apple employees across the nation who had all eyes on this election."

    Continue reading
  • Apple’s M2 chip isn’t a slam dunk, but it does point to the future
    The chip’s GPU and neural engine could overshadow Apple’s concession on CPU performance

    Analysis For all the pomp and circumstance surrounding Apple's move to homegrown silicon for Macs, the tech giant has admitted that the new M2 chip isn't quite the slam dunk that its predecessor was when compared to the latest from Apple's former CPU supplier, Intel.

    During its WWDC 2022 keynote Monday, Apple focused its high-level sales pitch for the M2 on claims that the chip is much more power efficient than Intel's latest laptop CPUs. But while doing so, the iPhone maker admitted that Intel has it beat, at least for now, when it comes to CPU performance.

    Apple laid this out clearly during the presentation when Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies, said the M2's eight-core CPU will provide 87 percent of the peak performance of Intel's 12-core Core i7-1260P while using just a quarter of the rival chip's power.

    Continue reading
  • Apple may have to cough up $1bn to Brits in latest iPhone Batterygate claim
    Lawsuit took its time, just like your older iOS handset

    Another day, another legal claim against Apple for deliberately throttling the performance of its iPhones to save battery power.

    This latest case was brought by Justin Gutmann, who has asked the UK's Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) to approve a collective action that could allow as many as 25 million Brits to claim compensation from the American technology giant. He claims the iGiant secretly degraded their smartphones' performance to make the battery power last longer.

    Apple may therefore have to cough up an eye-popping £768 million ($927 million), Gutmann's lawyers estimated, Bloomberg first reported this week.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022