India seizes $725 million of Xiaomi's cash

Chinese giant really got something in return for those cross-border payments, say money laundering cops


India's government has seized over $724 million of bank deposits held by Chinese gadget-maker Xiaomi and alleged the company has improperly moved funds offshore.

The Directorate of Enforcement, an arm of the Department of Revenue charged with investigating money laundering and violations of foreign exchange laws, did the deed. In a statement [PDF], the Directorate justified the seizure of ₹5551.27 Crore with a claim that Xiaomi has sent similar sums abroad under the guise of paying royalties and payments to other members of the Xiaomi group but did not receive any services in return.

"Xiaomi India has not availed any service from the three foreign-based entities to whom such amounts have been transferred," the statement reads, later adding an allegation that Xiaomi "also provided misleading information to the banks while remitting the money abroad."

The Directorate alleges the payments were ordered by Xiaomi HQ in China, that the three disputed transactions were all made in February 2022, and that two of the entities that received cash from Xiaomi India were US-based and benefited the Chinese company in an unexplained fashion.

Xiaomi has denied all wrongdoing, as follows.

Xiaomi is India's mobile phone market share leader, with analyst firm Counterpoint rating its 21 percent slice of the market as four points larger than second-placed realme, and five points more than Samsung.

India has in recent years been hostile to Chinese app-makers on grounds they represent a privacy risk to citizens and pursued a policy of encouraging global tech players to build their kit locally for both domestic consumption and export.

Xiaomi is not accused of flouting privacy laws and has well and truly come to the party in terms of supporting India's tech manufacturing ambitions by operating half a dozen plants on the subcontinent and planning to build more (including one to build TVs).

If Delhi is trying to send a message to Beijing with this seizure, it's being rather oblique about it.

However, sending money to parent companies is a known tax minimization tactic. Xiaomi India is owned by Xiaomi China but could well be structured so that it licenses designs of the kit it sells and therefore owes royalties.

Some of the international work on preventing tax avoidance aims to ensure that if such arrangements are used, the entities involved still pay tax in the nations where they make profits.

The Directorate's remit does not cover such matters. But the Department of Revenue – the Directorate's parent agency – has responsibility for all taxes in India. ®

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Always read the comments: Beijing requires oversight of all reader-generated chat
    'Editing and review' teams will be required to read everything and report dissent

    The Cyberspace Administration of China has announced a policy requiring all comments made to websites to be approved before publication.

    Outlined in a document published last Friday and titled "Provisions on the Administration of Internet Thread Commenting Services", the policy is aimed at making China's internet safer, and better represent citizens' interests. The Administration believes this can only happen if comments are reviewed so that only posts that promote socialist values and do not stir dissent make it online.

    To stop the nasties being published, the policy outlines requirements for publishers to hire "a review and editing team suitable for the scale of services".

    Continue reading
  • Indian government signals changes to infosec rules after industry consultation
    Reports suggest SMBs will get more time, but core elements including six-hour reporting requirement remain

    Indian media is reporting that the government has consulted with industry about its controversial infosec reporting rules, possibly resulting in concessions that slightly ease requirements for some businesses.

    The rules, introduced on April 29 with no warning and a sixty-day compliance deadline, require organizations operating in India to report 22 different types of information security incidents within six hours of detection, maintain extensive logs of their own and customers' activities and provide that info to authorities as required, and use only network time protocol (NTP) servers provided by Indian authorities or synced to those servers.

    The rules generated swift and widespread opposition on grounds that they were loosely worded, imposed enormous compliance burdens, made India less attractive to foreign tech companies, and would harm privacy. The requirement to report even trivial incidents within six hours was criticized as likely delivering a deluge of reports that would contribute little to the stated goal of securing intelligence with which to defend the nation. The Internet Society warned that insistence on using Indian NTP servers would create an unhelpful reliance on that infrastructure.

    Continue reading
  • ZTE intros 'cloud laptop' that draws just five watts of power
    The catch: It hooks up to desktop-as-a-service and runs Android – so while it looks like a laptop ...

    Chinese telecom equipment maker ZTE has announced what it claims is the first "cloud laptop" – an Android-powered device that the consumes just five watts and links to its cloud desktop-as-a-service.

    Announced this week at the partially state-owned company's 2022 Cloud Network Ecosystem Summit, the machine – model W600D – measures 325mm × 215mm × 14 mm, weighs 1.1kg and includes a 14-inch HD display, full-size keyboard, HD camera, and Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity. An unspecified eight-core processors drives it, and a 40.42 watt-hour battery is claimed to last for eight hours.

    It seems the primary purpose of this thing is to access a cloud-hosted remote desktop in which you do all or most of your work. ZTE claimed its home-grown RAP protocol ensures these remote desktops will be usable even on connections of a mere 128Kbit/sec, or with latency of 300ms and packet loss of six percent. That's quite a brag.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022